Quality of Life Survey

Dominic White

 
Random Entry: Off to Jozi
< Draft Proposal Stumble | Research Proposal >

Quality of Life Survey

Residence management and leadership structures have no accountability and performance reporting feedback mechanisms. The SRC wants them. The first meeting of the QoL working group went well. This is what we came up with.
Reasons
  1. Accountability
  2. Performance reporting (management, leadership structures and facilities)
  3. Problem and Positive elements identification

ImplementationQuestionaire with several parts
  • Hall facilities
  • House Facilities
  • Hall and House management structures and people
  • Scope for Hall specific add-on
  • Information about person under control of that person (i.e. confidential unless they decide otherwise)
Goals
  • Table at Board of Residences meeting on the 23rd March
  • Board of Residences to form working group to implement
  • Hall Warden and House Warden buy-in
Some suggestions
  • Frequency of survey.
  • Who and How will results be collated and checked.
  • Detail specific members to be surveyed and against what they will be surveyed (e.g. job profile).
  • Discuss long-term improvement allowing for bad reviews from which to improve. i.e. Emphasise learning.
  • Consult with existing stakeholders and Wardens to ensure a group up buy-in rather than upper management enforced.

Monday, March 8. 2004
Posted by Dominic White in Politics
Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

Last modified on 2005-05-10 23:23
 

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

No comments

Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA